🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.